Charlie Tims
Associate
Charlie Tims recently co-wrote Video Republic, a look at the social and political significance of internet videos. He is currently involved in producing a part of the TED prize in London.
at 10:06am
on Saturday, 4th October 2008
The XDRTB story is spreading fast. As a part of our role in the project we have been inviting people to comment on different aspects of James Nachtwey's wish. If you'd like to contribute a response, please do send them in. We'll put them up here and at the Emergency Room gallery off Brick Lane in London.
Here is Darrell Berry from Bigshinything's reaction:
We inherit the archetypes of the Photo-Journalist and their Work from the profession’s Golden Age: that of Time and Life magazines and of early Magnum; the searing inscription of truth burnt into 36 frames of Ilford FP4. Photo-journalists, Heroes of the Modern Age.
Now? When we read about the Magnum photographers at a meeting in New York, early morning 9/11 2001, who grabbed their Nikons and ran to the streets to get the story, we feel respect for their courage, but also a little bemusement. Like some half-forgotten, fallen league of superheroes striding into action: Magnum? They still do that stuff? Huh? Aren’t we, now, each and every one of us, citizen journalists, with cellphone and blog, our story to the world? No more Heroes.
But: a photo-journalist is one not only witness to events, but one able to bear witness to their meaning, with objectivity, truth in haste, for an audience often culturally and physically remote from those directly affected. How? Training, access, technology, narrative skill, cross-cultural literacy. We may view heroes with suspicion, but there’s value yet in the craft skills of the journalistic professional.
So: can’t a good journalist with access to citizen stringers achieve as much, bearing witness on behalf of those whose images serve as record of witness? Why not split the word photo-journalist at the hyphen and let’s be done: bury the whole idea with the other redundant heroisms of the Modern age?
No. Documentary evidence is increasingly easy to fake in post-production or presentation, and jaded audiences are conditioned to the contingency of all ‘truths’: in a cloudsourced, ever-more-diffusely-mediated future, the existence of individuals who both offer themselves to be and are able to bear witness is imperative. We need those who can say, resolutely, and incontrovertibly, “I was there. These are my images. This my testimony”.
More on Bigshinything
Here is Darrell Berry from Bigshinything's reaction:
We inherit the archetypes of the Photo-Journalist and their Work from the profession’s Golden Age: that of Time and Life magazines and of early Magnum; the searing inscription of truth burnt into 36 frames of Ilford FP4. Photo-journalists, Heroes of the Modern Age.
Now? When we read about the Magnum photographers at a meeting in New York, early morning 9/11 2001, who grabbed their Nikons and ran to the streets to get the story, we feel respect for their courage, but also a little bemusement. Like some half-forgotten, fallen league of superheroes striding into action: Magnum? They still do that stuff? Huh? Aren’t we, now, each and every one of us, citizen journalists, with cellphone and blog, our story to the world? No more Heroes.
But: a photo-journalist is one not only witness to events, but one able to bear witness to their meaning, with objectivity, truth in haste, for an audience often culturally and physically remote from those directly affected. How? Training, access, technology, narrative skill, cross-cultural literacy. We may view heroes with suspicion, but there’s value yet in the craft skills of the journalistic professional.
So: can’t a good journalist with access to citizen stringers achieve as much, bearing witness on behalf of those whose images serve as record of witness? Why not split the word photo-journalist at the hyphen and let’s be done: bury the whole idea with the other redundant heroisms of the Modern age?
No. Documentary evidence is increasingly easy to fake in post-production or presentation, and jaded audiences are conditioned to the contingency of all ‘truths’: in a cloudsourced, ever-more-diffusely-mediated future, the existence of individuals who both offer themselves to be and are able to bear witness is imperative. We need those who can say, resolutely, and incontrovertibly, “I was there. These are my images. This my testimony”.
More on Bigshinything
LOGIN to add comments
Comments